PhysicalTherapy.com Physical Therapy logo Phone: 866-782-6258

Selecting Appropriate Screening and Assessment Tools in the Skilled Nursing and Long-Term Care Populations: Where the Research Supports and Fails Us

Selecting Appropriate Screening and Assessment Tools in the Skilled Nursing and Long-Term Care Populations: Where the Research Supports and Fails Us
Heidi Moyer, PT, DPT, CEEAA
December 19, 2018

To earn CEUs for this article, become a member.

unlimited ceu access $99/year

Join Now
Share:

Know Your Limitations of a Study

The take-home point of this is to know your limitations. There's no one perfect outcome measure or perfect intervention. But, if you're aware of the limitations, then it helps you to work around them and have a stronger case for these people you're treating. When you're selecting an outcome measure, you also need to consider the population

Consider the Population

Setting/Environment. You don't want to pick an MCD value that's appropriate for somebody who is a subacute rehabilitation who just had a stroke maybe three-four weeks ago versus somebody who's had a stroke for three or four years and is in a community dwelling. They will have a different progression. You're going to expect a different level of improvements. Another example of setting and environment is a test that was studied, in the United States where we have one of the highest rates of obesity and comorbidities, versus Okinawa, which is one of the healthiest areas in the world and has the most number of centenarians per capita. 

Pathology/Medical Co-morbidities. Something else to consider is pathology and medical comorbidities. So a test that you would use for somebody that has MS is not necessarily a test that is going to be appropriate for somebody who has has a stroke.

Age. Studies ranging from 65 to 85 may not be appropriate for centenarians. Age is very important when we're establishing norms and a lot of tests that you'll see that have gone through large subsets of populations will stratify out their norms based off of age  We expect a little bit of a decline as the person gets older whether that's an age-related change or pathological, you have to look at the research for that.  We do expect some different values to be had between the different age ranges. So you wouldn't use a test that was appropriate for a 60-year-old in a 100-year-old.

Gender. Gender is also an important consideration.

Consider the Design

When considering the design of the study, you have to look and see how they performed it

Retrospective vs prospective. What were their methods?  A retrospective study is where you go back in time. For example, if you're doing a fall study, you're looking at any falls that that person had in the past six months. For a prospective study, you're looking at falls that a person has starting from a specific time point and moving forward. Typically, a prospective study has a lot more weight to it, because you're collecting data in real-time, whereas in retrospective, you are expecting people to be able to recall information from months ago when they may not even remember what they've had for breakfast last week. I know I certainly can't even remember what I had for dinner last night, let along being able to recall maybe a nontraumatic fall that happened three months ago.

Reliability and validity. You want to make sure that the test is measuring what it's supposed to and that it measures it consistently.

Power analysis. A power analysis is also very important. It is seeing how many subjects or patients you need in a specific subset of data to get a statistically important value and to be able to make sure that your data is supported.

Training prior to conducting the study.  For a lot of the outcome measures that are used in validation studies, you want to make sure that everybody is trained in a similar manner. I'm sure, as many of you guys in the clinic have seen the Berg being performed differently than you perform the Berg. Now, there is one specific way you're supposed to do a Berg Balance Test, but either through variation of training or something that's more clinically quicker and more convenient for you or others have fallen into a habit of performing it differently. So we're not always necessarily testing the test the way it should be.

Novice vs expert clinician. You should consider if it was a novice or an expert clinician that was conducting the study and doing the testing. That is because somebody who has done it either for many years might have it down pat, but it might be older science, or somebody who's newer might have newer science, or they might not be as consistent in the way that they're delivering the test because they don't have that experience. So it goes both ways.

To earn CEUs for this article, become a member.

unlimited ceu access $99/year

Join Now

heidi moyer

Heidi Moyer, PT, DPT, CEEAA

Heidi Moyer, PT, DPT, CEEAA graduated with her doctor of physical therapy degree from Angelo State University. Her research work in graduate school consisted of a longitudinal study correlating outcome measure assessments in local nursing home residents to falls risk. She assisted in successfully reimplementing her study designs in both the assisted living and greenhouse/dementia care settings. She serves in multiple volunteer roles within the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy (AGPT) including Eastern Regional Coordinator for the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy’s State Advocate Program, co-state advocate for Illinois, Clinical Liaison for the AGPT Balance and Falls special interest group, and a member of the GeriEDGE committee. Heidi is also the current active secretary for the Emerging Scholars and Professionals Organization within the Gerontological Society of America. Her passion is to serve the older adult community through community outreach to reduce rate and risk of falls and to promote healthy aging. She currently works in the home health setting in Chicago, Illinois.



Related Courses

Selecting Appropriate Screening and Assessment Tools in the Skilled Nursing and Long-Term Care Populations: Where the Research Supports and Fails Us
Presented by Heidi Moyer, PT, DPT, CEEAA
Recorded Webinar
Course: #3200 1 Hour
This course will review which evidence-based outcome measures are supported in the skilled nursing (SNF)/long term care (LTC) facility settings as per the current research, as well as those that fall short for applicable use in this environment. Through critical inspection of these items, the participant will be able to understand the importance of the use of population-relevant outcome measures to ensure best physical therapy practice in the SNF/LTC settings. This course is directly related to the practice of physical therapy and is therefore appropriate for the PT and PTA.

Temporomandibular Joint-Anatomy/Physiology
Presented by Lori Steinley, PT, MS
Recorded Webinar
Course: #1071 2 Hours
This course is designed to familiarize participants with the anatomy/physiology of the temporomandibular joint.

Temporomandibular Joint-Physical Therapy Assessment and Treatment.
Presented by Lori Steinley, PT, MS
Recorded Webinar
Course: #1072 2 Hours
Please note: This course is also offered in a series of recordings titled "The Temporomandibular Joint", course 1416.

This course is designed to instruct participants in the physical therapy assessment and treatment of the temporomandibular joint-including discussion of modalities, manual techniques and home exercises.

Nerve Transfers
Presented by Marie Pace, M.H.S., OTR/L, CHT
Recorded Webinar
Course: #2541 1 Hour
Please note: This course is also offered in a series of recordings titled "Series: Hand Anatomy, Transplants and Nerve Transfers", course 1542 which is offered for AOTA/0.3 and NBCOT/3.75.

Recent innovations have made it possible to transfer part of a nerve from one location and move it to another, restoring sensory and motor function before primary nerve regeneration could restore function. This seminar will help the therapist responsible for rehabilitation to understand how recovery occurs and how to establish a treatment plan.

Rehabilitation Considerations Following ACL Reconstruction
Presented by David Nolan, PT, DPT, MS, OCS, SCS, CSCS
Recorded Webinar
Course: #1744 2 Hours
An ACL tear is the most prevalent knee injury in athletics. Improved understanding of anatomy and biomechanics of the knee as well as the impact of the entire lower kinetic chain on knee function and injury has led to advancements in rehabilitation programs. This course reviews the evidence related to effective, criterion-based management from injury through return to sport.